I love seeing my friends and colleagues getting nominated for Hugo Awards.
This is how excited I get:
And I am really excited by seeing so many great nominees. There are going to be lots of first time winners this year, which is AWESOME. My favorite novel and short story from last year were nominated (Ancillary Justice and “If You Were a Dinosaur, My Love”). The fanzine, best related work, and fan writer categories are full of so much awesome I might explode (how am I supposed to decide between Liz Bourke, Foz Meadows, Kameron Hurley, and Abigail Nussbaum for fan writer? SERIOUSLY!). Book Smugglers! Pornokitsch! A Dribble of Ink! all in fanzine! The Campbell Award (not a Hugo) has a wonderful slate of nominees. Pacific Rim! So. Much. Awesome.
And yet. There is some not-awesome, too. Let’s talk about that, shall we?
I don’t love is Wheel of Time being nominated as an entire singular work. Sorry, no. I don’t care how you bend the rules, no. A 300,000 page that dragged on for 20+ years and had two authors is not a singular work. Article 3.2.4 of the WSFS constitution is the rule that applies here:
Works appearing in a series are eligible as individual works, but the series as a whole is not eligible. However, a work appearing in a number of parts shall be eligible for the year of the final part.
I can see how the rule was interpreted and I don’t agree with it, especially since the final part of WoT was split into three volumes. But I can see the interpretation and I hope that this doesn’t turn into a trend in years when long-running series conclude.
What I agree with, even less, is the campaign that went on to stuff the ballot box on the part of Larry Correia and Vox Day. They each wrote a post, shortly before the nominating deadline, exhorting their readers to submit a particular ballot. You can see their posts here and here (both are donotlinkified for your and my protection). I would be extremely interested to know how many ballots match that list in all respects. I would also be interested to know how many supporting memberships were bought for spouses, children, and extended family who did not actually submit those ballots. It would be ridiculously easy to game the nominations that way. Ridiculously.
It’s also potentially a violation of Article 6.2:
Natural Persons. In all matters arising under this Constitution, only natural persons may introduce business, nominate, or vote, except as specifically provided otherwise in this Constitution. No person may cast more than one vote on any issue or more than one ballot in any election. This shall not be interpreted to prohibit delivery of ballots cast by other eligible voters.
Not that it can be proven, of course–I assume they were smart enough to use different email addresses and mask their IPs if they voted on behalf of their grandparents and spouses. As Renay said on Twitter, this was gross and manipulative and not in the spirit of the award.
I am, very much, looking forward to ranking “No Award” higher than Vox Day, Larry Correia, Brad Torgerson, Dan Wells, Steve Diamond, and Toni Weisskopf.
But hey! Look at all that awesome that is on the ballot! Woo!
She dabbles in writing speculative fiction and poetry, but non-fiction is her bread and butter. She’s known for her coverage of various issues within genre around sexism and harassment, and can be found on Twitter as @eilatan.
With Annalee Flower Horne, she is a co-founder of the intersectional geek blog, The Bias.
Latest posts by Natalie Luhrs (see all)
- Links Roundup 08/26/16 - August 26, 2016
- 2016 Hugo Awards: Results and (Very) Personal Reflections - August 21, 2016
- Links Roundup 08/19/16 - August 19, 2016